| Author |
Message
|
| brundige |
 Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:03 am Post subject: materials |
 |
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1
|
Just a few questions.
1) Do any relativly low cost alloys exsist that contain a positve charge.
2) I am familiar with deprotonization, is there an opposite, a way to increase protons, if so what would work best with nitrogen.
3) What gas has the lowest dielectric strength
4)What would be the implications of a large amount of protons passing through a vacuum .
Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| William McCormick |
| Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:18 pm Post subject: Re: materials |
|
|
Forum Ph.D.
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 1052
|
| brundige wrote: |
Just a few questions.
1) Do any relativly low cost alloys exsist that contain a positve charge.
2) I am familiar with deprotonization, is there an opposite, a way to increase protons, if so what would work best with nitrogen.
3) What gas has the lowest dielectric strength
4)What would be the implications of a large amount of protons passing through a vacuum .
Thanks |
Could I ask what you are trying to do? I do not understand in what sense you mean positive charge, in the case of the alloy you are looking for.
Acid or alkali gases would probably have a good conductivity. Salt air transfers static electricity well.
Protons traveling through a vacuum would be super heated hydrogen separated from its Siamese bond of with another hydrogen atom, and blasted into a vacuum at some velocity for what ever reason you have.
I would imagine that separating the hydrogen would be the dangerous part. It makes a lot of heat. And requires an ARC to do it. I do not know if you can create an ARC powerful enough in a vacuum to separate the hydrogen. However an apparatus could be built to do this I am sure.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
_________________
http://www.Rockwelder.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
