| Author |
Message
|
| evariste.galois |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:38 am Post subject: can every statement be proven |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 13 Oct 2007 Posts: 11
|
there are many hypothesis that have not been proven yet (as the Riemann hypothesis etc.) I am just wondering if, theoretically, there would be a hypothesis that can not be proven at all.
I mean, I know that the Godel incompleteness theorem states that you can not prove the axioms of mathematics. Apart from that, has there been any efforts made to "prove" that certain hypothesis can simply not be proven? I guess the math involved would be far to complicated for me. even the fermat hypothesis has been proven but in such a complicated way that you would imagine that there must be even more complicated ways and detours to prove many other things. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| DivideByZero |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Junior

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 227
|
| This statement can not be proven. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sunshinewarrior |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 972 Location: London
|
| DivideByZero wrote: |
| This statement can not be proven. |
Ghost of Godel salutes you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| JaneBennet |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 06 Apr 2008 Posts: 765
|
The continuum hypothesis is one such unprovable hypothesis. This states that there is no set whose cardinality is strictly between that of the integers and that of the real numbers.
The set of all integers is countable and has cardinality denoted by (aleph nought). All countable sets have this cardinality. The set of all real numbers is uncountable and its cardinality is denoted . (It’s supposed to be lowercase gothic “c” – but I don’t know how to do gothic in TeX. ) It can be shown that – in other words, the cardinality of the real numbers is equal to the cardinality of the power set of a countable set. The continuum hypothesis states that there is no set with cardinality such that .
Kurt Gödel showed in 1939 that the hypothesis cannot be disproved using the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. He didn’t show that it couldn’t be proved, only that it couldn’t be disproved. The job was completed in 1963 when Paul Cohen showed that Zermelo–Fraenkel axioms are indeed inadequate to prove or disprove the hypothesis. _________________
A problem worthy of attack
Proves its worth by fighting back.
(Piet Hein)
Did You Know?
Fact of the day: Homotopy
Last edited by JaneBennet on Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sunshinewarrior |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 972 Location: London
|
Thanks for that, Jane.
Was it Greg Chaitin who demonstrated that there are, in fact, more unprovable theorems than provable ones? I'm pretty certain they worked this out as a direct extension from Godel, and didn't name/number these theorems, but it was a theoretical proof. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| JaneBennet |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 06 Apr 2008 Posts: 765
|
Thanks for the link. I’m afraid I’ve not heard of Gregory Chaitin before.  _________________
A problem worthy of attack
Proves its worth by fighting back.
(Piet Hein)
Did You Know?
Fact of the day: Homotopy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| serpicojr |
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Professor

Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 1128 Location: JRZ
|
\mathfrak{c} =  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| quantumdude |
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:24 am Post subject: Re: can every statement be proven |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 55
|
Am I missing something here? This question seems to have a very simple answer that doesn't have anything to do with Goedel or self reference.
| evariste.galois wrote: |
I am just wondering if, theoretically, there would be a hypothesis that can not be proven at all.
|
Yes: False hypotheses cannot be proven. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| quantumdude |
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 55
|
| serpicojr wrote: |
\mathfrak{c} =  |
Whoa, this place has LaTeX now?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| William McCormick |
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:01 pm Post subject: Re: can every statement be proven |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 03 Apr 2008 Posts: 1011
|
| evariste.galois wrote: |
there are many hypothesis that have not been proven yet (as the Riemann hypothesis etc.) I am just wondering if, theoretically, there would be a hypothesis that can not be proven at all.
I mean, I know that the Godel incompleteness theorem states that you can not prove the axioms of mathematics. Apart from that, has there been any efforts made to "prove" that certain hypothesis can simply not be proven? I guess the math involved would be far to complicated for me. even the fermat hypothesis has been proven but in such a complicated way that you would imagine that there must be even more complicated ways and detours to prove many other things. |
No, when they introduced neutrons into science there was no statement, that the government could not prove, could not corrupt, alter or ridicule.
The scientists the government put in charge either knowingly committed treason against America. For which they could be shot. Or they unknowingly committed treason against America and could be threatened with treason. Either way there is no more solid basis for truth in America.
Sincerely,
William McCormick _________________ http://www.Rockwelder.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| JaneBennet |
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 06 Apr 2008 Posts: 765
|
| serpicojr wrote: |
\mathfrak{c} =  |
I just saw this.
Thanks!  _________________
A problem worthy of attack
Proves its worth by fighting back.
(Piet Hein)
Did You Know?
Fact of the day: Homotopy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| quantumdude |
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:02 pm Post subject: Re: can every statement be proven |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 10 May 2005 Posts: 55
|
| William McCormick wrote: |
| evariste.galois wrote: |
there are many hypothesis that have not been proven yet (as the Riemann hypothesis etc.) I am just wondering if, theoretically, there would be a hypothesis that can not be proven at all.
I mean, I know that the Godel incompleteness theorem states that you can not prove the axioms of mathematics. Apart from that, has there been any efforts made to "prove" that certain hypothesis can simply not be proven? I guess the math involved would be far to complicated for me. even the fermat hypothesis has been proven but in such a complicated way that you would imagine that there must be even more complicated ways and detours to prove many other things. |
No, when they introduced neutrons into science there was no statement, that the government could not prove, could not corrupt, alter or ridicule.
The scientists the government put in charge either knowingly committed treason against America. For which they could be shot. Or they unknowingly committed treason against America and could be threatened with treason. Either way there is no more solid basis for truth in America.
Sincerely,
William McCormick |
Must be a full moon out somewhere.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| DivideByZero |
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: Re: can every statement be proven |
|
|
Forum Junior

Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 227
|
| William McCormick wrote: |
| evariste.galois wrote: |
there are many hypothesis that have not been proven yet (as the Riemann hypothesis etc.) I am just wondering if, theoretically, there would be a hypothesis that can not be proven at all.
I mean, I know that the Godel incompleteness theorem states that you can not prove the axioms of mathematics. Apart from that, has there been any efforts made to "prove" that certain hypothesis can simply not be proven? I guess the math involved would be far to complicated for me. even the fermat hypothesis has been proven but in such a complicated way that you would imagine that there must be even more complicated ways and detours to prove many other things. |
No, when they introduced neutrons into science there was no statement, that the government could not prove, could not corrupt, alter or ridicule.
The scientists the government put in charge either knowingly committed treason against America. For which they could be shot. Or they unknowingly committed treason against America and could be threatened with treason. Either way there is no more solid basis for truth in America.
Sincerely,
William McCormick |
Ahhh a perfect example of an unprovable hypothesis!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Faldo_Elrith |
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: Re: can every statement be proven |
|
|
 Forum Freshman

Joined: 02 Jul 2008 Posts: 74
|
| quantumdude wrote: |
| Yes: False hypotheses cannot be proven. |
Why not? You can prove something that is false to be false just as you can prove something that is true to be true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| MagiMaster |
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Junior

Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 288
|
Actually, you can rarely (if ever) prove any theory to be true. You can only attempt to disprove it and fail repeatedly. This does not constitute a proof, but it provides an ever-growning set of evidence that the theory is at least close to the truth.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|