| Author |
Message
|
| tsolkas-1 |
 Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:18 am Post subject: Tsolkas or Einstein ? |
 |
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 08 Jul 2006
Posts: 29
|
EXPERIMENT-12 and EXPERIMENT-13
at
www.tsolkas.gr
The most important experiments in the history of Physics!
How a physicist, using only a pencil, five blank sheets of paper and the power of his intellect (without performing a single physics experiment) can prove that Einstein was wrong!!!
tsolkas
_________________
123456 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| 425 Chaotic Requisition |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Doctor
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3443
Location: England, UK.
|
Personally with all due respect, I don't think you are going to get many fans. I don't have the maths knowledge or where all to defend that statement, but you've been here before saying that Einstein is wrong, when cleary his theories do check out well, I don't even need a degree to see that. Relativity works fine and gravity as spacetime seems to function adequatley in the space we conveive around us. I understand that you have put a lot of effort into this, but you are kind of advertisising your theory on the forum, and quite frankly people are going to percieve it as spam. Just a friendly pointer/warning.
Cheers,
SVWilllmer.
_________________
"Victory is in trying. Defeat is in not". - SVRDW. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| theQuestIsNotOver |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Senior
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 362
Location: grail search
|
| 425 Chaotic Requisition wrote: |
Personally with all due respect, I don't think you are going to get many fans. I don't have the maths knowledge or where all to defend that statement, but you've been here before saying that Einstein is wrong, when cleary his theories do check out well, I don't even need a degree to see that. Relativity works fine and gravity as spacetime seems to function adequatley in the space we conveive around us. I understand that you have put a lot of effort into this, but you are kind of advertisising your theory on the forum, and quite frankly people are going to percieve it as spam. Just a friendly pointer/warning.
Cheers,
SVWilllmer. |
No, you jump to conclusions. This is evidence people live in their own bubble.
_________________
It is impossible to get a correct answer when being tested on something you don't care about.
(god is here for good, he ain't leave'n)
If Jesus does not call for a scientist to save society, if we are lead to believe science will save us, then we must all depend on faith. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twixly |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 57
|
I find it refreshing someone is challenging the "big ideas" of science.
Too bad I dont have time (or probably the knowledge) to review this in-depth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| theQuestIsNotOver |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Senior
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 362
Location: grail search
|
| Twixly wrote: |
I find it refreshing someone is challenging the "big ideas" of science.
Too bad I dont have time (or probably the knowledge) to review this in-depth. |
And your point is?
_________________
It is impossible to get a correct answer when being tested on something you don't care about.
(god is here for good, he ain't leave'n)
If Jesus does not call for a scientist to save society, if we are lead to believe science will save us, then we must all depend on faith. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Twixly |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 57
|
| theQuestIsNotOver wrote: |
| Twixly wrote: |
I find it refreshing someone is challenging the "big ideas" of science.
Too bad I dont have time (or probably the knowledge) to review this in-depth. |
And your point is? |
Exactly what I wrote?
Unless the laws of physics, for example, is constantly tested through scientific ideas science has no chance of moving forward.
I dont know if you understand this, but proving something WRONG in science is actually GREAT, it´s progress! So people need to try and prove things wrong. All of science is build on testing, retesting and critical thinking.
This is the second thread you´ve replied to my post with no sort of information at all. I dont get you one bit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Stuart Thomson |
| Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 107
|
You ask what mathematical relationships apply to the fact that all bodies, regardless of their mass, fall at the same speed. Here you go.
F=m(object) x a
F=(G x m(earth) x m(object))/r^2
(G x m(earth) x m(object))/r^2 = m(object) x a
As you can see, the mass of the object cancels out of this equation.
Also i think you should probably do some experiments to see if your theory stands up. However, I do commend you for questioning the accepted theories, and thinking for yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PritishKamat |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 1:30 am Post subject: Re: Tsolkas or Einstein ? |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 188
Location: Mumbai, India
|
| tsolkas-1 wrote: |
EXPERIMENT-12 and EXPERIMENT-13
at
www.tsolkas.gr
The most important experiments in the history of Physics!
How a physicist, using only a pencil, five blank sheets of paper and the power of his intellect (without performing a single physics experiment) can prove that Einstein was wrong!!!
tsolkas |
I'll believe you if you come up with mathematically sound proofs and not some casual thoughts.
By the way, I appreciate your courage to oppose widely, almost universally accepted models of the universe.!
_________________
Beyond Equations,
Pritish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| 425 Chaotic Requisition |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Doctor
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3443
Location: England, UK.
|
| theQuestIsNotOver wrote: |
No, you jump to conclusions. This is evidence people live in their own bubble. |
Exactly. Jumping to conclusions is a way of working towards that conclusion. Such as saying 'speed of light's velocity is the same for all observors no matter their own reference frame. Or the laws of physics are the same for all observors no matter their reference frame. If we didn't jump to conclusions, we wouldn't reach a conclusion we wanted to. If you have a conclusion already before you finish, and it is not the same, you know what needs to be changed  .
_________________
"Victory is in trying. Defeat is in not". - SVRDW. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SteveF |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Bachelors Degree
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 484
Location: NC USA
|
Christos Tsolkas:
I have taken the time to actually read what you have written. Please explain the following:
| Quote: |
| Experiment ΧΤ, due to its simplicity and very low cost, can be easily conducted on a broad scale by Universities, Physics Institutes, etc, as well as by university and even high school students!!! |
Explain why you have not done so!
You have merely postulated the results of the experiment. I believe your assumptions of results are incorrect, yet you use your error to claim Einstein is wrong, that Relativity Theory is junk.
Go back and actually do your own simple, low-cost experiment. Explain why your observed results do not match your predictions. Then review Einstein again.
-------
Pritish:
| Quote: |
| I appreciate your courage to oppose widely, almost universally accepted models of the universe.! |
Give this a little more thought. I hope you will realize that any fool can oppose widely, almost universally accepted models of the universe. In fact, that's all that fools can do!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| William McCormick |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Professor
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 1657
|
| 425 Chaotic Requisition wrote: |
Personally with all due respect, I don't think you are going to get many fans. I don't have the maths knowledge or where all to defend that statement, but you've been here before saying that Einstein is wrong, when cleary his theories do check out well, I don't even need a degree to see that. Relativity works fine and gravity as spacetime seems to function adequatley in the space we conveive around us. I understand that you have put a lot of effort into this, but you are kind of advertisising your theory on the forum, and quite frankly people are going to percieve it as spam. Just a friendly pointer/warning.
Cheers,
SVWilllmer. |
Einstein's theories were very wrong. And it took billions in grants, and laws against humanity to push his theories through. Billions back when $100,000.oo was unfathomable to most.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
_________________
Warning: Any information contained in this post could be part of a conspiracy to make you stupid. So only use it if you understand it. Use at your own risk.
http://www.Rockwelder.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| William McCormick |
| Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: Tsolkas or Einstein ? |
|
|
Forum Professor
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 1657
|
| PritishKamat wrote: |
| tsolkas-1 wrote: |
EXPERIMENT-12 and EXPERIMENT-13
at
www.tsolkas.gr
The most important experiments in the history of Physics!
How a physicist, using only a pencil, five blank sheets of paper and the power of his intellect (without performing a single physics experiment) can prove that Einstein was wrong!!!
tsolkas |
I'll believe you if you come up with mathematically sound proofs and not some casual thoughts.
By the way, I appreciate your courage to oppose widely, almost universally accepted models of the universe.! |
There are no mathematical proofs of Einstein's theories. None whatsoever. And no experiments that even come close to proving it.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
_________________
Warning: Any information contained in this post could be part of a conspiracy to make you stupid. So only use it if you understand it. Use at your own risk.
http://www.Rockwelder.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| PritishKamat |
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Posts: 188
Location: Mumbai, India
|
What the heck, the theory of einstein still fits all the voids left by physics done before it!
I mean, if this guy has the mettle to challenge The great theories that physics has produced so far, right from Newton to Einstein, this person must either be the greatest physicist or the most WRONG (no offence tsolkas) one. Well, so, if he really is the former, he must give me something to make predictions, which can be proved true later by experiments, maybe. Mathematics, if provided, is a great tool for doing so.
_________________
Beyond Equations,
Pritish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SteveF |
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Bachelors Degree
Joined: 28 May 2007
Posts: 484
Location: NC USA
|
Â
| PritishKamat wrote: |
I mean, if this guy has the mettle to challenge The great theories that physics has produced so far... |
Come on, Pritish, use your head! If you are impressed with people who challenge existing theories, those who emphatically deny well-accepted facts, then our own William McCormick must be one of your greatest heroes!
Go read Tsolkas' arguments. I mean, actually read them. You should be able to spot the errors in each argument. They are not very subtle.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| William McCormick |
| Posted: Fri May 23, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Professor
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 1657
|
| PritishKamat wrote: |
What the heck, the theory of einstein still fits all the voids left by physics done before it!
I mean, if this guy has the mettle to challenge The great theories that physics has produced so far, right from Newton to Einstein, this person must either be the greatest physicist or the most WRONG (no offence tsolkas) one. Well, so, if he really is the former, he must give me something to make predictions, which can be proved true later by experiments, maybe. Mathematics, if provided, is a great tool for doing so. |
Look I do not know how to explain this to you. But we had the things working in hand. That Einstein and his ridiculous theories said could not exist.
Einstein types attacked real things like ants. They raised numbers of individuals, and trained them against reality. And the government was the smart bug leader of the whole bunch.
And the government and even the military just gave up trying to push the real working high tech stuff into the light. They were shelved away and pretty much wiped away. Many were demoted for even mentioning these things.
Einstein was dead wrong. Just plain all out dead wrong. Not even a slightly interesting idea. Unless you like wild science fiction.
Did anyone remember reading the article from the English popular mechanics? Where professor Joad is quoted as saying that the nuclear bomb was the stupidest thing since the combustion engine?
Why do you think he said that? Because we do not need combustion engines or fuel. We get unruly without them.
We cannot be cut off from travel or supplies, if we are not reliant on gasoline. Without military action.
The proof to us is that Einstein wasted ten minutes building a mass of radioactive substances to create energy. He was a very sick man. A super coward and mental case.
And the only thing sicker is that today I have to prove a mental retard wrong.
Sincerely,
William McCormick
_________________
Warning: Any information contained in this post could be part of a conspiracy to make you stupid. So only use it if you understand it. Use at your own risk.
http://www.Rockwelder.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
