| Author |
Message
|
| andre |
 Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: The greenhouse of Miskolczi |
 |
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 116
|
Buried deep in the stack of scientific publications is this paper.
It claims to refute the current math of greenhouse effect.
According to scholar.google, the paper is only cited once, which suggest that it is carefully ignored, rather than being discussed scientifically.
Any atmospheric physician / mathematician prepared to sink his teeth in and confirm or refute the greenhouse of Miskolczi?
Is he right?
| Quote: |
....The new equation proves that the classic solution significantly
overestimates the sensitivity of greenhouse forcing to optical depth perturbations....
...In the radiation scheme of Eq. (10) the runaway greenhouse effect is impossible,..
...On local scale the regulatory role of the water vapor is apparent. On
global scale, however, there can not be any direct water vapor feedback
mechanism, working against the total energy balance requirement of the
system....
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| andre |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 116
|
Of course you would expect that with modern satellite measurements, the orginal math of radiative atmospheric properties, would have been confirmed or refuted. There is where this publication comes in
http://smsc.cnes.fr/documentation/IASI/Publications/LBL_EX.pdf
Look who is the last author!
| Quote: |
| ...This result suggests that most of the discrepancies with measurements are not due to the particular code mechanics but to insufficient knowledge in basic spectroscopy... |
Looks like a good reason for him work it all out once more. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
