The Science Forum - Scientific Discussion and Debate  
 
 Live Chat    FAQ    Search    Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
Science Forum Forum Index » Experimentation » Radiation Shields and Ion Drives

  
 Radiation Shields and Ion Drives « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
Aireal
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:50 am    Post subject: Radiation Shields and Ion Drives Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 11

Could Ion Drive technology be the key to radiation shielding, while at the same time improving ion drive efficiency?

The standard ion drive has a stage of operation where it collects excess electrons and injects them into the ion beam to prevent the spacecraft from accumulating a large negative potential.

What if that stage could be eliminated, and the negative potential be used to help shield the crew and equipment. First we must look at the problems of radiation shielding for crews in outer space. The three main schools of thought on these are: Material Shielding, which has the drawback of mass. A major factor for a ship with ion drive. Magnetic Shielding, which is weak at some points, much like the Earth is. It also requires a strong magnetic field of about 20 teslas, which might have its own ill effects, we don't know yet. Electrostatic Shielding, by giving the hull a positive charge of 2 billion volts or so , you can repel cosmic-ray protons. But it creates a bombardment of electrons in the range of its field effect.

The key might be to combine the strengths of each of these, while reducing their drawbacks, with a unique hull concept.

Picture the hull as a giant capacitor, and the ion drive giving it a charge with the electrons that would normally be collected and ejected into the positive ion stream. Each charged layer of the hull would be separated by an insulator material that is also a good radiation shielding material. The most likely bet would be a plastic, or maybe a ceramic. The skin of the hull should have a neutral charge, where as one end of the ship would have a positive charge, and the other a negative, powered by the hull capacitor system. This will generate a magnetic shield around the ship. Now all three of the main shielding systems are in place, let's look at how they interact.

At this time a nuclear electric propulsion (N.E.P.) can deliver power levels of several hundred kilo watts to an ion drive, and may reach the megawatt category in the near future. This means an ion drive could generate a large charge in the hull to create a magnetic shield around the ship. I am not sure what the max. field strength would come to, but most likely not large enough to stop the radiation on its own. The good new is, it does not have to stop it, just redirect a few particles toward the poles of the ship, and slow down the rest.

Once the charged cosmic particles have been slowed down by the magnetic field, they will encounter the hull. Passing through the skin of the outer hull, they will next encounter the material which serves as insulator and shielding. This will slow the particles down even more. Then it will encounter the first charged layer of the hull capacitor system. These charged layers will act as electrostatic shielding within the hull. Then the cosmic particles must repeat the process of going through material and charged layers till it is hopefully stopped. Because our hull has both positive and negative layers in it, it will protect against a greater range of charged particles than the standard electrostatic field design. To a charged particle, this process will act as if the hull was a material shield with electrostatic shields within it, combining these two shielding concepts. As this setup is used to create the magnetic field, all three shielding concepts are now one system. So we now have all three of the main radiation shielding systems in place, all working together. So what are the advantages of this approach, let us look.

The first advantage is an overall reduction in mass needed to protect the crew. Every gram of weight saved in material shielding would be worth its weight in gold for an ion drive ship. With just material shielding alone, it would take about one kilogram of material per square centimeter to protect a crew, that's a lot of mass. Where as magnetic and electrostatic systems have huge energy requirements. By combining the magnetic and electrostatic systems into one, we have already cut the power needed by half. With the system using the potential difference created by the ion drive, the need for its own power supply is reduced or eliminated, another reduction in weight. Because the load of protecting the ship is split between three systems, we do not have to use as much power for magnetic and electrostatic systems as if the were run alone. So the overall energy requirements for the ship is reduced also. Yet every design has some drawbacks, so let's look at how these can be reduced in this system.

Magnetic fields provides little shielding at the poles. As our magnetic field is created by the charged areas at each end of the ship, this problem will be increased from particle bombardment in these regions. The simplest way to solve this is to place the crew area in the center of the ship, away from the poles. Antenna or other extensions from the ship could move the poles even farther away from the crew, for an added measure of safety. As the crew would also need shielding from the reactor, the ship design may look something like this. A long cylinder with a antenna projecting from the front of it, the reactor and ion drive at the rear, with the crew area in the center. Of course other designs are possible with this concept. The standard electrostatic shielding concept has the drawback of causing particle bombardment due to its field radius in space around the ship. By locking these charged areas in the hull with a capacitive design, we limit the range that this field expands into space, thereby reducing the problem of particle bombardment. Next we must pick the shielding/insulator material. As it must fill two jobs, it may take some research to determine the best choices. Plastics like polyethylene might be a good starting point. If a lightweight material for the charged layers could be found, this would help in mass reduction, and make the charged layers better as material shielding. Work is already being done in this area. Adding carbon, graphite or nanotubes to plastics is one approach, polycarbonate might be a good chice for this, as it would add some impact protection also. Interpenetrating Polymer Network ( I.P.N.), and similar work by companies like the Eeonyx Corporation are promising also. Thus we can reduce the disadvantages of each of these systems while taking advantage of their strong points. The next question is, are there any other aspects we need to address with this design concept?

What if the capacitive charge in the hull started climbing too high for some reason? There would need to be a system in place to bleed off excess power and divert it to the ion drive or some other use. In the event of a solar storm, primary power could be diverted to increase the field strength. After the danger has passed, the extra power could be sent to the ion drive. This approach may allow for less than max. protection in the normal state, and protection increased when needed, resulting in an even lighter ship design. Perhaps a Faraday Cage (RF shielding) could be constructed around the crew area to help protect them from the magnetic field effects also. Another area for improvements would be the outer skin of the hull. Could it be made to generate usable power from the constant bombardment of particles. A recent discovery by researchers of the Material Sciences Division of Berkeley and partners show that alloys of indium, gallium, and nitrogen can convert virtually the full spectrum of sunlight, from the near infrared to the far ultraviolet, to electrical current. So even the outer hull of the ship may have more than one use in the future. The hull should be modular in construction and design. This will lessen the chance of system failure if a hull section gets damaged, allow repairs to be conducted in flight, and make construction quicker and more cost effective.

An increase in ion drive efficiency might be obtained by correctly locating the positive pole at the rear of the ship in relation to the ion drive. As the positive ion stream left the ion drive it would encounter the positively charged field at the rear of the ship. The ion stream would be repelled even faster away from the ship, while imparting a slight increase in thrust to the ship. While it may not be much of an increase, every little bit helps over long interstellar trips.

Hopefully this approach would reduce the weight and energy requirement of our spaceship by 2/3 over standard designs, while still protecting the crew and equipment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Swaroop
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 31
Location: currently India

First of all, I have to say I am amazed that you have written such a wonderful topic and no one has replied to your thread!!!

Commendable topic!

Speaking about ion-drives and other advanced means of propulsion, I have to admit I have very little knowledge of physics , I am into medicine thats why... But, it doesnt mean I am not fascinated with hi-sci stuff... ever since I saw a huge chevron fly silently overhead on nov 5 2004, I have always been wanting to know more about advanced modes of propulsion... amazing
_________________
Why not take a look at my ART GALLERY
http://swaroop.deviantart.com/store/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
(In)Sanity
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Cosmic Wizard
Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Posts: 2153
Location: Phoenix AZ

We'll make it sticky for a while and see if anyone responds to it, good topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aireal
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 11

Sorry it has been a while since my last post, my daughter has been on spring break from school and I have not been able to get near the computer.

Let me also thank you for the interest in my post and making it "sticky". It is a long post, and I still had to gloss over some points to keep the length down. It is a lot of info to digest all at once. My hope is to work out any problems with the concept and submit it to those more qualified than myself. But as of this time, I do not have a clue as to how to bring it to anyone's attention. I have been working on this about 5-6 years, on and off. Thanks again for the interest in my work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chamilton333
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Senior
Forum Senior

Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 346

i dont know too much about ion drives, but using excess force for other means is always a good idea. and saftey first is also used Very Happy Very Happy Smile
_________________
I don't suffer from insanity, i enjoy every minute of it

the road to succes is never paved or clearly marked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Aireal
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 11

Well I think I now know why there has not been much activity on my subject. No one seems to be doing any work in this field. In fact, when I do a web search any more on aspects of my work, most of the results I get are my own work. Perhaps I am just ahead of the curve on this one. Thank you again for the interest you have shown in my work, it means a lot to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Aireal
Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 11

Here is a simlifed version of my first post. Only the radiation shielding concept is presented. The addition of the ion drive info made it too long and harded to understand.

Radiation Shielding

The three main schools of thought on these are: Material Shielding, which has the drawback of mass. A major factor for a ship design. Magnetic Shielding, which is weak points at the poles, much like the Earth does. It also requires a strong magnetic field, which might have its own ill effects, we don't know yet. Electrostatic Shielding, by giving the hull a large positive charge, you can repel cosmic-ray protons. But it creates a bombardment of electrons in the range of its field effect.

The key might be to combine the strengths of each of these methods, while reducing their drawbacks. This can give us a reduction in mass and energy requirements over any stand alone system. Lets start with electrostatic shielding and how it can be improved.

As stated earlier, a section of a ship can be given a charge to repel like charges, but it attracts like charges. Both positive and negative particles are a problem in space. Instead of charging the outside of the hull around the crew where bombardment would be a problem, move the charged areas to the ends of the ship, away from the crew. Use both a positively and a negatively charged region at opposite ends of the ship, perhaps on extensions to increase distance from the crew area. This will draw charged particles away from the area between the poles, reducing the number headed for the crew area. We have in effect turned the ship into a large dipole.

As cosmic radiation bombards the poles of the ship, the charged particles will cause a change in the potential of the dipole we have created. This change in potential will caused the dipole to generate a magnetic field. A magnetic field will also help to deflect cosmic radiation away from the crew area and towards the poles of the ship. As we are using the electrostatic system to generate the magnetic field, there is little to no increase in mass and energy requirements for the added protection. The dipole system could be operated from within the ship to generate a magnetic field instead of depending on the effects of cosmic radiation. I have yet to determine with method would be the most efficient.

Material shielding is last on our list. Its use should be limited to vital areas due to mass. Plastics like polyethylene fit the bill of low mass and good protection. Recent work that allows plastics to carry a charge however can make material shielding even more effective. Charged layers of plastic within the plastic shielding, whose charge does not radiate into space, would help to stop charged particles that penetrate the hulls skin. This will increase the effectiveness of material shielding, allowing less to be used for the same degree of protection. An overall reduction in mass.

So by combining all three shielding concepts into a single design concept, an overall reduction in mass and energy requirements from protection from cosmic radiation can be achieved.

Soon I hope to post some experiments that can be done with this model for testing. Been so busy, I don't get to do as much work on this as I would like. Thanks again everyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kosta
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 89

That is an extremely interesting idea.. I would love for you to post experimentation details about this topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Red
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 64

the two poles would stop charged radiation particals but you would still have to take into account gamma radiation which would mean you would be back at the old problem of physical shielding. As this requires the most physical shielding i dont know whether it is worth having the dipole at all unless its creation is of no energy cost and you can get some reduction in weight. Perhaps the shielding can be worn by the crew to block the gamma rays instead of coating the whole vessel. The idea of a combined physical charged shield covering the whole ship would be a better idea bt i dont no of the medical implications
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aireal
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 11

Kosta

It seems I must build an experimental model myself, as I have been unable to generate interest in my concept.
Finding the money and the space to perform them is a problem however.


Red

You are correct in that the charged poles would stop the charged particles but not affect the gamma radiation much. The charged poles create a magnetic field around the ship also. Work at NASA has shown that a magnetic field of very high strength will repel radiation, but with a required field strength of 20 tesla's needed for this, it raises medical implications.

I need to conduct tests with lower field strengths. Instead of stopping them with a massive 20 tesla field, I wish to try and redirect their path away from the crew area with a lower field strength. As long as a fair percentage of them can be redirected in this manner, it will add to the protection level. By using the charged poles of the ship and the magnetic field they create, the two systems work together with less energy expended. Hopefully this can be accomplished with field strengths that humans can tolerate.

Gamma rays have another problem. They create more dangerous particles when they impact the physical shielding. Thus I incorporated charged layers in the hull to help trap the particles gamma rays produce in this impact. This also deceases the mass needed for physical shielding.

On the energy needed by the dipole system. The energy flows through the system losing some to resistance and some when the system absorbs or deflects cosmic radiation. The energy is then sent to the ion drive at the end of its circuit. Most of the energy used by the system is in stopping radiation. Excess electrons are then expelled out the rear of the ship to neutralize the positive ion tail so it is not drawn back to the ship. The addition of an ion drive really compliments this concept.


Everyone

I still have a lot of work to do in this area. Thank you everyone for the input you all have provided. I know that this idea will never make me any money, I may even be dead of old age before it is really needed. But as long as the concept is out here on the net, someone else can pick up where I left off when the time is right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
   Page 1 of 1

Science Forum Forum Index » Experimentation » Radiation Shields and Ion Drives
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 


Google
 

© 2004-2008 Thescienceforum.com

Sponsored by EnluxLED

Partner Forums
Politics Forum  Radar Detector