The Science Forum - Scientific Discussion and Debate  
 
 Live Chat    FAQ    Search    Usergroups
 
Register  ::  Log in Log in to check your private messages
 
Science Forum Forum Index » Military Technology » Iran

  
 Iran « View previous topic :: View next topic » 
Author Message
B1AZE
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:25 am    Post subject: Iran Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 45
Location: East London

Ok.now so far we now realise that Iran is tryingto show off military power and shit,and its obvoius they want nuclear arms because why would an oil rich country wanna bother about energy,global warming etc.

...Cold war 2 in the next decade,place your bets

BRAP
_________________
We spend most of our lifes not knowing..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mars
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Sophomore
Forum Sophomore

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 138

Not a cold war 2 by any means whatsever. Iran is effectively 3rd world, they have no way of competing with the US in respect to technology or research capabilities.

Barry
_________________
Thinking of the question is greater than knowing the answer...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
425 Chaotic Requisition
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2008 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Doctor

Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 3176
Location: Somewhere, nowhere.

But they do when it comes to launching nuclear weapons, thats what it bottles down to.
_________________
"Laugh at life or it will laugh at you". - SVRDW.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Mars
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Sophomore
Forum Sophomore

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 138

Not really, getting a missile to launch isn't a very difficult task. Landing it on the other side of the world with accuracy in metres is. Also their missiles are unlikely to be on par with US ones, (more accurate, faster, higher).
The US could shoot it down whereas Iran could not.
_________________
Thinking of the question is greater than knowing the answer...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
UKDutyPaid
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Freshman
Forum Freshman

Joined: 13 Nov 2007
Posts: 79
Location: London

You don't need a rocket to blow someone up, the last few years have illustrated that. But explosives are one thing. Dirty bombs or even nuclear warheads is another story entirely. Just because that naughty little kid can't throw well, doesnt mean I'm gonna give him a rock.

Besides the USA may not be the intended target. It doesnt take much rocket power... or even a rocket to hit targets closer by. Besides, if you managed to get perhaps North Korea or China to somehow be your friend, who needs the long range capability...

That said, the American 3 stage missile defense network is shaping up very nicely. The New THAAD is pretty awsome in itself. And that can be mobilized to the borders of rogue states. So perhaps a stand-off/cold war scenario is on the cards. But something tells me if it kicks off, this time it will get messy.

maybe Nostrodarmus was right Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
icewendigo
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forum Senior
Forum Senior

Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 378

You guys arent seriously telling me you are falling for the propaganda brewed by the same people that brought us the Iraq war?



Iran is NOT a threat.

Imo, Iran should have nukes as a deterent from an attack by the only country thats killed scores of civilians with nukes and that as invaded countrys on either side of Iran and supported the Iraq war against Iran (and toppled their elected government in he 50s).

..but not only is Iran not developing nukes, its complying with the atomic energy treaties and allows inspections that have shown they are not developing weapons unlike other countries which have not signed anything and have got nukes and arent getting scrutinized (Israel, Pakistan, India).

The Lies about the wiping out of israel have been debuked by numerous Pharsy translators, the President which is likely to loose the next elections anyway(yes elections, unlike Saudi Arabia) said something like Zionism (like Naziism and communism) should be written off. The fact he was misquoted shows there a deliberate campaign to beat up the wardrums for another warcrime.

Unlike the grotesque propaganda by McCain, there is NO link between AlQaeda and Iran (in fact AlQaeda would probably get killed or arrested by Iranians, like the other terrorist groups the US is supporting within Iran)

How many Americans in the USA have been killed by Iranian terrorism last year? 1000? 10? No, none. But the US supported terrorist groups mentioned previously have killed many Iranians

So give me a brake with Iran, attacking it would be a war crime, a crime against humanity, a potential enviromental disater(nuking nuclear reators?), and the consequences would be far far more severe than the Iraq war (and not just for people in that region).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
   Page 1 of 1

Science Forum Forum Index » Military Technology » Iran
Jump to:  



You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 


Google
 

© 2004-2008 Thescienceforum.com

Sponsored by EnluxLED

Partner Forums
Politics Forum  Radar Detector