| Author |
Message
|
| varcreat |
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:44 am Post subject: Can we patent facts about nature? |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 13 Jul 2008 Posts: 12
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| KALSTER |
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 2088 Location: South Africa
|
no _________________ "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| 425 Chaotic Requisition |
Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 The Doctor
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 3176 Location: Somewhere, nowhere.
|
I can. Time travel is patented, I came up with it. I invented spacetime.  _________________ "Laugh at life or it will laugh at you". - SVRDW. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Ophiolite |
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Radioactive Isotope

Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4564 Location: Scotland
|
Portions of genomes, or rather specific genes, have been patented by the research groups who sequenced them and identified their roles. _________________ The Universe is not only weirder than we imagine it is weirder than we can imagine. J.B.S.Haldane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| KALSTER |
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 2088 Location: South Africa
|
| Ophiolite wrote: |
| Portions of genomes, or rather specific genes, have been patented by the research groups who sequenced them and identified their roles. |
Really? What does that mean then, that nobody else can use that information in their research?  _________________ "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| 425 Chaotic Requisition |
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
 The Doctor
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Posts: 3176 Location: Somewhere, nowhere.
|
Now you know why Einstein worked in a patent office . _________________ "Laugh at life or it will laugh at you". - SVRDW. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| KALSTER |
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 2088 Location: South Africa
|
Well, I would have thought that there would be a distinction between raw scientific knowledge and gadgets.  _________________ "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Zitterbewegung |
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Sophomore

Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 178
|
| KALSTER wrote: |
| Ophiolite wrote: |
| Portions of genomes, or rather specific genes, have been patented by the research groups who sequenced them and identified their roles. |
Really? What does that mean then, that nobody else can use that information in their research?  |
No, it means that the MoFos from Monsanto will sue you when their genetically engineered crap pollinates your corn on the adjacent patch of land allthough you neither intended nor wanted this. They'll sue you anyway allthough it's their fault, allready happened. _________________ I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| KALSTER |
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Cosmic Wizard

Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 2088 Location: South Africa
|
| Zitterbewegung wrote: |
| KALSTER wrote: |
| Ophiolite wrote: |
| Portions of genomes, or rather specific genes, have been patented by the research groups who sequenced them and identified their roles. |
Really? What does that mean then, that nobody else can use that information in their research?  |
No, it means that the MoFos from Monsanto will sue you when their genetically engineered crap pollinates your corn on the adjacent patch of land allthough you neither intended nor wanted this. They'll sue you anyway allthough it's their fault, allready happened. |
Is this the American judicial system at work again? I can understand producing something and then patenting that (a genetically engineered invention), but can they really patent the raw data, i.e. the data on the roles of specific genes? _________________ "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Zitterbewegung |
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Sophomore

Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 178
|
IIRC there was a trial about a company patenting the genes of one man's liver or spleen and he contested this claim and the company won the case allthough it were HIS genes. Don't know the exact circumstances but a google search should yield results. _________________ I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sunshinewarrior |
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 974 Location: London
|
| Zitterbewegung wrote: |
| KALSTER wrote: |
| Ophiolite wrote: |
| Portions of genomes, or rather specific genes, have been patented by the research groups who sequenced them and identified their roles. |
Really? What does that mean then, that nobody else can use that information in their research?  |
No, it means that the MoFos from Monsanto will sue you when their genetically engineered crap pollinates your corn on the adjacent patch of land allthough you neither intended nor wanted this. They'll sue you anyway allthough it's their fault, allready happened. |
That's the politicised take (and I happen to agree with it).
More forensically, though, the patented portion of the genome (which can only be patented when regular patent conditions obtain - must not have been public prior, must be original, must be unique etc) can then be used as any patent can - licensed, protected from misuse, and with the standard patent period applying (as far as I know). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Steve Miller |
Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Bachelors Degree

Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 473 Location: Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
|
No I guess.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|